For this weeks Blog Post our group has chosen an article about the riot that erupted from a protest at the end of an Egyptian soccer game last week. This protest took the lives of many innocent bystanders and left the stadium in ruins. So we are asking you to respond to this question for the week "is a sporting event the right place to begin a protest with so many people in these close confines?"
Egypt soccer match brawl leaves at least 73 dead
An Egyptian soccer match between two longtime rivals — the Port Said team and the Ahly of Cairo — turns deadly when hooligans supporting the winning team attack opposing players and fans.
Reporting from Cairo — An Egyptian soccer match between two longtime rivals descended into a violent echo of the bloodiest days of last year's revolution as hooligans supporting the winning team stormed the field, attacking opposing players and fans in clashes that reportedly killed at least 73 people.
The fighting on the pitch quickly took on broader political overtones. The Muslim Brotherhood, which controls nearly half of the new parliament, laid blame for the bloodshed on thugs connected to toppled President Hosni Mubarak who are plotting to destabilize the country.
The clashes broke out in the town of Port Said after that city's team won a rare victory over the visiting Ahly, a powerhouse club from Cairo. Port Said supporters swarmed the field immediately after the game. Ahly players and fans ran for cover beneath the stadium and into locker rooms as chaos spread.
PHOTOS: Dozens killed in soccer riot
The locker room "looks like a morgue," said Ahmed Nagui, an Ahly coach.
The bloodshed stunned a nation that has been enduring protests and violence since last year's revolution overthrew Mubarak. There have been sharp animosities between the two teams — Port Said fans attacked an Ahly bus last year. But nothing suggested the level of hostilities that erupted Wednesday night, another sign of how combustible Egypt is as it unsteadily attempts to move toward democracy.
"The events in Port Said are planned and are a message from the remnants of the former regime," Essam Erian, a member of parliament with the Brotherhood's Freedom and Justice Party, said in a statement.
Security officials feared the riot could provoke retaliation by die-hard Ahly fans, known as Ultras. The group, a mix of university students, workers and democracy advocates, helped defend Tahrir Square against Mubarak loyalists last February, and was involved in the attack on the Israeli Embassy in Cairo in September. Its members also have been on the front lines in the recent deadly clashes between antigovernment protesters and riot police and soldiers.
Ultras, a catchphrase for supporters of many clubs, have become an ingrained, if erratic, phenomenon in the antigovernment protest movement against the police and the ruling military council. Many regard themselves as protectors of civil liberties who will not hesitate to hurl stones and Molotov cocktails at police, as they did in clashes in November and December that killed scores of people.
It is uncertain how they will respond to the soccer melee. Ahly fans have announced a march on the Interior Ministry in Cairo for Thursday. The ministry, barricaded by concrete and barbed wire, is the despised touchstone of the corrupt Mubarak regime and a symbol for many activists of the revolution's failure to force the military from power.
Smoke colored by the light of flares clung to the spectator stands in Port Said's stadium as millions of bewildered Egyptians watched the nation's newest wrinkle of deadly unrest unfold on television. Police appeared both overwhelmed and unwilling to respond, often watching while frantic fans raced past them. One player said the scene looked like a war.
"There are 11 deaths at my hospital. Two other hospitals include 25 deaths. Three fans have also died in the stadium," Hassan Esnawy, the manager of Port Said's Amiry hospital, said in a televised interview. "Some died of stampede, and others died of suffocation."
Egyptian TV later quoted medical authorities as saying at least 73 people had been killed. Some were beaten, but the Health Ministry reported that most appeared to have died of suffocation, head trauma and stampede-related injuries. TV footage showed fans clashing with knives and other weapons. More than 1,000 people were injured.
Field Marshal Mohamed Hussein Tantawi, the nation's military ruler, dispatched military planes to Port Said to pick up Ahly players and fans and return them to Cairo. The Egyptian parliament called for an emergency session Thursday.
Indications that the situation was unusually volatile came when Port Said fans threw fireworks at Ahly players before the match. Hooligans tried unsuccessfully to rush the field during halftime, but there were no confrontations during 90 minutes of play. Moments after the game, which Port Said won 3 to 1, hooligans sprinted across the field to attack Ahly players and fans.
Two Ahly players were injured, and the team quickly blamed police for not preventing the onslaught.
"The security forces left us, they did not protect us. One fan has just died in the dressing room in front of me," veteran Ahly player Mohamed Abou-Treika yelled while speaking on the phone to a TV channel. "To hell with football if the situation is like this…. Are people's lives that cheap?"
Another Ahly player, Mohamed Baraket, said: "People have died, we are seeing corpses now. There are no security forces or army personnel to protect us."
The fighting on the pitch quickly took on broader political overtones. The Muslim Brotherhood, which controls nearly half of the new parliament, laid blame for the bloodshed on thugs connected to toppled President Hosni Mubarak who are plotting to destabilize the country.
The clashes broke out in the town of Port Said after that city's team won a rare victory over the visiting Ahly, a powerhouse club from Cairo. Port Said supporters swarmed the field immediately after the game. Ahly players and fans ran for cover beneath the stadium and into locker rooms as chaos spread.
PHOTOS: Dozens killed in soccer riot
The locker room "looks like a morgue," said Ahmed Nagui, an Ahly coach.
The bloodshed stunned a nation that has been enduring protests and violence since last year's revolution overthrew Mubarak. There have been sharp animosities between the two teams — Port Said fans attacked an Ahly bus last year. But nothing suggested the level of hostilities that erupted Wednesday night, another sign of how combustible Egypt is as it unsteadily attempts to move toward democracy.
"The events in Port Said are planned and are a message from the remnants of the former regime," Essam Erian, a member of parliament with the Brotherhood's Freedom and Justice Party, said in a statement.
Security officials feared the riot could provoke retaliation by die-hard Ahly fans, known as Ultras. The group, a mix of university students, workers and democracy advocates, helped defend Tahrir Square against Mubarak loyalists last February, and was involved in the attack on the Israeli Embassy in Cairo in September. Its members also have been on the front lines in the recent deadly clashes between antigovernment protesters and riot police and soldiers.
Ultras, a catchphrase for supporters of many clubs, have become an ingrained, if erratic, phenomenon in the antigovernment protest movement against the police and the ruling military council. Many regard themselves as protectors of civil liberties who will not hesitate to hurl stones and Molotov cocktails at police, as they did in clashes in November and December that killed scores of people.
It is uncertain how they will respond to the soccer melee. Ahly fans have announced a march on the Interior Ministry in Cairo for Thursday. The ministry, barricaded by concrete and barbed wire, is the despised touchstone of the corrupt Mubarak regime and a symbol for many activists of the revolution's failure to force the military from power.
Smoke colored by the light of flares clung to the spectator stands in Port Said's stadium as millions of bewildered Egyptians watched the nation's newest wrinkle of deadly unrest unfold on television. Police appeared both overwhelmed and unwilling to respond, often watching while frantic fans raced past them. One player said the scene looked like a war.
"There are 11 deaths at my hospital. Two other hospitals include 25 deaths. Three fans have also died in the stadium," Hassan Esnawy, the manager of Port Said's Amiry hospital, said in a televised interview. "Some died of stampede, and others died of suffocation."
Egyptian TV later quoted medical authorities as saying at least 73 people had been killed. Some were beaten, but the Health Ministry reported that most appeared to have died of suffocation, head trauma and stampede-related injuries. TV footage showed fans clashing with knives and other weapons. More than 1,000 people were injured.
Field Marshal Mohamed Hussein Tantawi, the nation's military ruler, dispatched military planes to Port Said to pick up Ahly players and fans and return them to Cairo. The Egyptian parliament called for an emergency session Thursday.
Indications that the situation was unusually volatile came when Port Said fans threw fireworks at Ahly players before the match. Hooligans tried unsuccessfully to rush the field during halftime, but there were no confrontations during 90 minutes of play. Moments after the game, which Port Said won 3 to 1, hooligans sprinted across the field to attack Ahly players and fans.
Two Ahly players were injured, and the team quickly blamed police for not preventing the onslaught.
"The security forces left us, they did not protect us. One fan has just died in the dressing room in front of me," veteran Ahly player Mohamed Abou-Treika yelled while speaking on the phone to a TV channel. "To hell with football if the situation is like this…. Are people's lives that cheap?"
Another Ahly player, Mohamed Baraket, said: "People have died, we are seeing corpses now. There are no security forces or army personnel to protect us."
1. This soccer riot on the pitch is begin for the reason that two longtime rival fight for their winning team they support, attracting opposite players and fans and killed at least 73 people. this has never happened before. Although soccer game is an activity which may arise people's excitement, it is still a serious accident. There should be serious reasons toward that, the safety guard are first not prepared for this conflict. but the picture that showed players for Cairo's Ahly soccer club run for safety after rioting is one of the good solutions they did. In addition, it has arise the political conflict between the Muslin Brotherhood and President Hosni Mubarak. in the article, we know that fans carry knives and other weapons to hurt the innocent people which is a really serious and immediate problem to solve. The sport stadium is a place where people can enjoy their interest, but now it becomes a dangerous and crowded place which is hard for people to get out.the safety security should be improved to ensure other fan's safety and their passion toward soccer.
ReplyDelete6. There are many ideas in this blog that are very controversial. One of the biggest controversies with this article is that fact that the fans of the winning team approached the field resulting in the death of over 70 people. Obviously, this is not a good thing for fans to rush the field because it may endanger the people that are a part of the game or in this instance, the bystanders. I know that some of the people may have go excited, but it created a riot killing many. It has also caused a political rivalry that has brought up the conflict between Muslin Brotherhood and President Hosni Mubarak. A person can conclude from this article that the fans rushing the field was more than just excitement that their team won; it was to defeat the people that the have been having controversy with.
ReplyDelete6. There are many ideas in this article that could be considered controversial. The entire article is a controversy because the event resulted in 73 people dying. The author attempts to prepare you in advance by telling you the fact that 73 people died so you knew what was going to happen and then he went into more gory details. The author does cite a primary source of a witness of the events. On the matter of the question asked I don't think a soccer stadium is the right place to stage a protest. They're too many innocent people who could get hurt.
ReplyDelete6. Obviously, there are many controversial idea ideas in this article; for instances, blaming police for not preventing the onslaught; but the most controversial idea would be targeted to the protest itself taking many people’s lives and completely destroying the stadium. In the beginning of the article, the author reports the current consequences: attacking opposing player and fans in clashes that reportedly killed at least 73 people; and then giving the further details. The author attempts to persuade the audience that this kind of protest is destructive and it endangers people, even innocent bystanders; we can tell this from many evidences. The words “at least 73”, to some extent, imply the brawl leaves would be increase; therefore, the author is likely to against the event by emphasizing on the serious and blooded consequence of the protest. He cites words from a manager of Port Said's Amiry hospital that “There are 11 deaths at my hospital. Two other hospitals include 25 deaths. Three fans have also died in the stadium”. These casualty figures also show the disastrous consequence. What’s more, the author also uses a set of photos delivering the message that dozes killed in this soccer riot. Some of them reflects burning and damaging (violence); some of them reflects tearing and being injured (hopeless and victims). These images also suggest the blooded event. All the evidences are supporting the author’s argument.
ReplyDeleteLastly, answering the question, I agree with Zach’s opinion that sporting event is not the right place to begin a protest with so many people in these close confines.
6. I also agree that this article is very controversial. Sporting events is absolutely not the place for a riot or protest. As seen in this article emotions are high and their are many people in a closed environment with different view points and willing to speak out against them. This causes for a lot of violence and puts many innocent people at risk like we have seen in the article were 73 people were killed at a rivalry soccer game. I completely agree with the author in persuading the readers of this article to realize that the protest should not have taken place at the rivalry soccer game and only caused harm.
ReplyDelete6. Obviously, this article is controversial. The story tells of a protest that turned violent resulting in over 70 deaths. This kind of thing shouldn't be happening. The people just wanted to get out and watch a sporting event and ended up having to fear for their lives. I understand that the environment was heated and maybe some fights were bound to break out but this type of thing can't evolve into people getting killed.
ReplyDelete6- I believe this article causes much controversy and debate. People should not have to fear for their lives at a sporting event; which is meant to be care-free and for entertainment. Of course, it is a heated rivalry and their is much tension between the two clubs, but a soccer stadium is not the place to protest. There are innocent people that were injured because of some careless fans. That is just not okay.
ReplyDelete6. Soccer games around the world are known for their crazy fans, but this event completely passed the line. It is clear that this riot broke out not only because of the tension during the soccer game, but political issues in Egypt as well. This is a controversial article because the deaths of 73 people were involved, and any event related to death is bound to strike up some controversy. In the beginning of the article, the author clearly states that there was a soccer match between two long-time rivals and 73 people were killed...that's the perfect recipe for controversy. The fact that the Egyptian Parliament called for an emergency meeting shows that they are trying to resolve the underlying conflicts and make for a somewhat better community. The author cites that most deaths were caused by suffocation, head trauma, and stampede related injuries, according to the Health Ministry. So the author reveals more and more details related to this disturbing event, as the article goes on.
ReplyDelete7. I believe this article does a great job a shedding light on a political tensions that catalyzed the riot in the stadium. The author cites many primary sources that would elicit a emotional response from the readers. One such primary source was the quote from Ahmed Nagui, an Ahly coach, which said "The locker room 'looks like a morgue...'". This description forms a powerful image in the readers mind while also possibly making the reader side with the Ahlys instead of the ones he calls 'the hooligans'. Calling the other side hooligans also forms an image in the readers head of someone who is unruly and causing unnecessary harm. Overall the author does a good job at swaying the reader to the anti- Mubarak position by making the Mubarak supporters actions seem unjustified.
ReplyDelete6 - This article screams controversy. The author displays his opinion on the controversial subject in the quick summary preceding the actual article: "An Egyptian soccer match between two longtime rivals... turns deadly when HOOLIGANS... attack opposing players and fans." The term "hooligans" does not carry a positive connotation. By his use of language, the author persuades his readers that the animosity and violence is silly to carry over from the political world to the sports world. His usage of diction obviously is persuasive; several of the responders preceding me also agree this article is hugely controversial and that the slaughter of these sports fans was senseless.
ReplyDelete6. I also agree that there are many ideas in this article that could be considered debatable. The whole article is a controversy actually. This is because 73 people died during this riot at a rivalry soccer game. The writer starts out by just giving basic facts of the riot including the total number of death. He then goes on to explain more giving gruesome specifics. I do not think that a soccer field is the place to hold a riot. I agree with many people that too many innocents can get hurt and it’s crazy to think that this could have happened anywhere. Protesting should not break out at sporting events hands down.
ReplyDelete6.) It is not appropriate to begin a protest at a sporting event. Sporting events are a means of entertainment, not a place to let known political views or arouse political controversy. As a result of the fracas, 73 people had lost their lives. The soccer game was not a good place to start protesting, it was fatal to the so many that died and the many more that were injured.
ReplyDelete6. It is very obvious that there is much controversy in this article. One example is how the players were accusing the police of not acting on the riot earlier and instead not doing much at all to prevent and help stop it. I think most readers agree that the soccer game is definitely not the right place for a riot on the controversy of the parliament to happen. There were a few people quoted in the article who give their own opinions on the riot that took place. One of them explaining how there were 11 deaths in one hospital and 25 in another and some even died at the stadium. The author though reported that there was a total of 73 deaths because of this riot.
ReplyDelete6. This incident was at the very least a sad one because of the high amount of casualties at what is meant to be a fun and enjoyable event. I believe that it was wrong of the winning fans to turn violent against the opposing fans due to a rivalry. It is worse that the Egyptian government tried to turn this incident into a political one. Sports have no place for politics and there should have only been mourning after this incident instead of political slandering of rival parties for allegedly falicitating the incident.
ReplyDelete1) It is easy for us Americans to sit here and tell these Egyptians that they have a problem. It is easy for us to say that soccer is meant to a fun activity for everyone to enjoy. However, is most countries around the world, soccer is a bigger deal than football and basketball are in USA. It becomes much more personal when choosing "favorite" teams. It is essentially ones identity. The article states that this riot was almost expected to happen. These fans are crazy, and when the home team upset the away team, fans were taking shots at each other. It became more than just a soccer game. When a few people start fighting, it creates a snowball effect until hundreds are fighting (If there are no security to enforce safety, which there weren't). People could not escape the violence. These stadiums are usually cheaply built and have only one main entrance/exit. Security guards weren't doing much to protect the citizens, and this is the result. Of course, something like this doesn't belong at a sporting event. But, violence has historically taken place at soccer stadiums. This one just took it to a new level.
ReplyDelete^Joe Biladello
Delete6. There is no doubt that this article is controversial. Any sporting event resulting in the deaths of seventy-three people is indisputably controversial; how can a simple game lead to such catastrophe? Obviously outside the United States soccer is very popular and to some, soccer is everything; it impacts many aspects of life including politics. Soccer hooliganism isn't uncommon in nations like Egypt, but when seventy-three people are dead after a single game it has gone too far. It is devastating to see pride and excitement for an athletic team turn into such awful violence. In regards to police enforcement, I believe that these games need to be better regulated; there should be no question as to whether police were there to help.
ReplyDeleteI think that in America we do not realize how popular of a sport soccer is in other countries around the world. Soccer plays a very influential role in the lives of many people around the world, but that does not mean it is appropriate for a riot to be staged during an athletic event. I think the article brings up some controversial points about the authorities roles in tragedies such as these. In this case, I would hope that people would learn from such a terrible event and would remember the lives that were lost that day. - Danielle Valentine
ReplyDelete6. This article is very controversial and has a very debatable topic. I believe that any public sports event should not end in a riot like this one did. There are families attending the game together and that is not something children should be around. People should not have to worry about things like this taking place. There should be more security and police at such big rivalries, just in case it gets to a point like this one did. The fact that people felt like the police wasn't even there is rediculous. Police is there for people to feel safe at all time, including sporting events. Fans should realize what they are doing is crossing the line and should be more controlled. Fans need to learn how to stay at a level that is fun and safe for everyone.
ReplyDelete-brad